Spent all day yesterday ruminating my way through James chapter 3. The Lord help me come to grips with myself on a few things that I see in myself have been in error. The main thing that was revealed to me was that my motivation for writing has strayed from glorifying the Lord. It seems, recently, rather than relying upon the Holy Spirit, I have been overly reliant upon external sources to the Bible. Thank you Lord for revealing that and thank you for forgiving me.
Moving into James chapter 4 today, let’s dive in!

In Focus: James 4:1 – 3 (NASB95)
1What is the source of quarrels and conflicts among you? Is not the source your pleasures that wage war in your members? 2You lust and do not have; so you commit murder. You are envious and cannot obtain; so you fight and quarrel. You do not have because you do not ask. 3You ask and do not receive, because you ask with wrong motives, so that you may spend it on your pleasures.

After prayerful consideration, I believe the Lord is revealing to me that there is a correlation between the first three verses of James chapter 4 and James 1:13 – 15: “13Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am being tempted by God”; for God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone. 14But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own lust. 15Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death.” Verse 13 must be included so that we cannot blame God. Doing this did not save Adam as revealed in Genesis chapter 3 and it will not save us either.

The hinge pin is in the parallel use of lust in verses James 4:2 and 1:14. I believe the Lord wants us all to see that if it were not for our own sins spawned out of lust and pride there would be little if any quarrels and/or conflicts in our lives and beyond that the world as a whole. What am I talking about?
The first thing we have to do is get our head wrapped around the huge multifaceted question of “what is sin.” How could I possibly address such a huge issue as this in one short blog? Thankfully, the apostle John has already done all of the heavy lifting when he wrote, “For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the boastful pride of life, is not from the Father, but is from the world.” (1 John 2:15, NASB95).

When we boil sin down to its essence we see it is very simple. First there are only three kinds of sins (two conceived lusts and one pride):

  1. We feel it and decide we want it.
  2. We see it and decide we want it.
  3. We decide we are entitled to it.

We can do a really quick proof text of all of this by looking at Genesis 3:6. You see, Satan’s big gigantic, overwhelming playbook against God’s human being, in His image, creations contains only three temptations. That’s it! That’s all he’s got! And yet, we simple human beings have been falling for his lies and tricks for thousands of years. “When the woman saw that the tree was good for food (lust of the flesh), and that it was a delight to the eyes (lust of the eyes), and that the tree was desirable to make one wise (pride of life),…” You can also quickly look at the temptations of Jesus and you will see the exact same three temptations used by Satan.

Now, before we succumb to the lie, “the devil made me do it” Satan is also a created being. Yes, God created all of the angels including Satan. As such, Satan is nowhere equal to God. Satan is not omniscient, omnipotent, or omnipresent. In our eagerness to escape guilt we give Satan a whole lot more credit for our own sins than he is entitled to receive. James makes this very clear in 1:14. But don’t take my word for it, consider what happened to Eve when she decried, “the serpent deceived me and I ate.” Did it work as an excuse with God for her? Nope. It won’t work for you or me either.

Let’s take a look at James 4:1 where he rhetorically asks the sources of “quarrels and conflicts” and then provides the answer “is not the source your pleasures…” Our Bible uses the word “pleasures.” This is a translation of the originally employed Greek, ἡδονή hēdonḗ;1 This is the Greek base word that yields our modern word hedonism or hedonistic. The rest of the verse relates pleasure seeking to war being waged “in your members.” So what groups are we members of? We are members of families, communities, churches, nations, the world. Grab your Bible and read Proverbs 15:17 and 17:1. Seems like the source of conflict in all types of groups starts to come into clearer focus.

Moving on to James 4:2 “you lust and do not have, so you commit murder.” When I first read this I said, “Whoa, hold on a minute James! I may want some things but I’m sure not going to murder someone to get them!” Did not Jesus explain that calling someone, “you fool” was the same thing in God’s eyes as murdering that person? Yes, yes He did (Matthew 5:21 – 22). Now we do not use the word fool very much anymore but what about the words “idiot,” “dummy,” or any one of hundreds of adjectives used to impugn someone’s character? I am guilty. How about you? James is not finished yet. “You are envious and cannot obtain; so you fight and quarrel.” When we are envious of someone we covet what they have that we do not have. Feeling convicted yet? And finally one for all of the “name it and claim it Christians.” You do not have because you do not ask.” Hold on a minute… James 4:3 very plainly teaches us that even if we ask God above to give us something we ask with wrong motives. Which is why “Name It – Claim It” is a false teaching. Most of the time we ask for something to satisfy one of our three basic sins (1 John 2:16). God will not grant such a prayer request because it goes against His very nature.

So how can we take all this and get it into something that we can apply every day in our own life? There are two ways to categorize the exhortations. The inward working of our spirit submitting to the Holy Spirit and letting the Spirit flow outwardly for the world to see. In the larger sense this comes under participating with the Holy Spirit in the process of sanctification otherwise known as being made into the likeness of Christ. The second working is how we as a member of the group can help others. These exhortations are found in Romans chapter 14 and can be summed up as avoiding “anything by which your brother stumbles.” So we should ask ourselves are we doing anything or living in any manner which causes our brother or sister anger or covetousness? And this list goes far beyond the eating meat and drinking wine discussed in Romans chapter 14. Everything is on the table and nothing can be excluded from our honest self-assessment.

Footnotes:
1 Zodhiates, Spiros. 2000. The complete word study dictionary: New Testament. Chattanooga, TN: AMG Publishers.  gen. hēdonḗs, fem. noun from hḗdos (n.f.), delight, enjoyment, which is from hḗdomai (n.f.), to have sensual pleasure. Pleasure, gratification, enjoyment. In the NT, used only of physical pleasure (Luke 8:14; Titus 3:3; James 4:3; 2 Pet. 2:13). Figuratively used as desire, appetite, lust (James 4:1).

A) Happy Holidays
B) Merry Christmas
C) Happy Hanukkah
D) Good Tidings of Great Joy
E) None of the above because I know you always ask tricky questions.

The best of the worst answers is clearly D. “Then the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid, for behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy which will be to all people. For there is born to you this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord. And this will be the sign to you: You will find a Babe wrapped in swaddling cloths, lying in a manger (Luke 2:8-12).”
The poorest choices are A and B. Both of these are secular greetings that emphasize non-Christ centered reasons for celebration. The next worst choice is C because while Hanukkah is commemorated based on an actual event in the second century BC Jewish revolt led by Judah Maccabee, he was not the true Messiah sent by God. Not to mention that Hanukkah has nothing to do with the birth of the Messiah anyway.
So, the actual best answer is indeed E. Why?

To begin with let’s answer the question: “Why does this topic matter?” I’m going to attempt to draw the distinction that exists between the polarized positions of the debate whether or not to celebrate Christmas. In so doing I hope that some common ground can be etched out of both positions and thereby bridging a peace. The two polarized positions can best be summarized as first, not to celebrate Christmas. Nowhere in the Bible is Christmas identified among God’s defined holy days and December 25th is not named in the Bible. The main argument for celebration is “Jesus is the reason for the season.” This gives us the opportunity to use Christmas in our evangelism efforts to bring Christ to an unbelieving world.

This issue is no less divisive today than it has been for centuries. Check it out for yourself. Just do a web search using “do Christian celebrate Christmas?” Or “is Christmas Christian?” You will be able to choose from a whole plethora of websites with a whole range of opinions, arguments, etc. the main reason I want to look into this issue for myself is that so many people I know have become more and more depressed this holiday season than in times past. I wonder why that is?

Let’s take a closer look at the best of the worst answers, “Good Tidings of Great Joy.” This is one of the best-known and most beloved of Bible verses surrounding the birth of Jesus (Luke 2:8-12). Not only does an angel sent from God announce the wonderful event to the shepherds but then this angel is joined by a multitude in heaven singing praises to God. Clearly then, if God celebrated the birth of Jesus it must be okay if we celebrate as well. That seems to me to be a pretty legitimate position to take. The problem with using this verse as a justification for celebrating Christmas is that there is no way of knowing if this event took place on December 25th. What little scriptural evidence does surround this event points to a birth during warm weather so December is eliminated out of hand. This gets at the heart of the most significant problem with celebrating December 25th as the birth of Jesus. So, leaving that aside for a moment, how many of us actually use Christmas as an opening for a discussion of salvation through Jesus Christ? I have not been able to find a single evangelism model that includes a discussion of Christmas. Biblically, evangelism is based on the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ not his birth. Is that not so? Read the words of Paul in 1 Corinthians 15:3-8 and Acts 26. I find it interesting that when Paul was testifying before Agrippa that he mentions nothing about the immaculate birth of Jesus Christ (he does briefly touch upon the birth prophecy though). While there are many Christmas themed gospel tracts, I have not found one that actually uses the birth of Christ as the means to receiving eternal life from God. Why? Because to say that is heresy. Not a single one of us is saved because Jesus was born. Is that not so?

So are there any legitimate reasons to celebrate Christmas as an evangelism event? Probably. If so, they are likely linked to the concept of gift giving. The Magi gave gifts to Jesus (Matthew 2:11). But how many of us actually give gifts to strangers during Christmas? Probably some but how many of those gifts are gold, frankincense, and myrrh? Isn’t it more likely true that we spend the majority of our Christmas celebration budget giving gifts to family and friends? Finally, I would like to offer what I believe to be the only legitimate reason to evangelize using Christmas.
The holiday period between Thanksgiving and New Year’s Day is also the time of year when suicides, bouts with depression, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, etc. are most prevalent. These are all absolutely critical issues that people have because of the holiday season itself and the failure of their own expectations. The stresses and pressures of the holiday season can become so overwhelming. These are the people who need to hear about the joy of a new life in Jesus Christ. Perhaps, we know someone who is suffering from some of these problems. Maybe the joy of Christmas could bring some light into their otherwise dismal outlook.

In turning our attention to the absence of Christmas and the December 25th celebration, it is very difficult to refute the truth of this position. There is however, the biblical truth that Jesus was born in the flesh and the prophecy of the nature of that birth is an important fulfillment of Old Testament Scripture. So, celebrating with the heavenly host the birth of Jesus Christ and giving glory to God for sending his Messiah is absolutely a reason to celebrate. The key is the joy that we experience in our beloved Jesus. Joy is eternal which makes it different from being happy or merry. The apostle Paul said, “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom, teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord. And whatever you do in word or deed, (emphasis mine) do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through Him (Colossians 3:16-17).” I cannot find anything un-biblical about choosing December 25th as a day that my family is going to set aside to give glory to God for sending Jesus to us. What I will not do is tell anyone that “Jesus is the reason for the season.” Because “Christmas” is a derivation of Christ Mass. Since my family does not partake in Roman Catholic Mass, this would not be appropriate. My Jesus cannot be contained in one day or a single church liturgy. I will celebrate with joy every day of my life that he took my sins and exchanged them for eternal life. And I will make no apologies about that either.

The fifth commandment reads: “‘Honor your father and your mother, the LORD your God has commanded you, that your days may be prolonged and that it may go well with you on the land which the LORD your God gives you (Deuteronomy 5:16).” The parallel although earlier verse is Exodus 20:12 which is directly referenced in the latter verse quoted here. There can be little doubt the fifth commandment is the very first commandment just about all of us learn and in most cases the learning starts long before we can speak. All of us arrived here on earth through the very same creative process. The process itself being created by the Lord God on the sixth day of creation upon which He blessed Adam and Eve to be fruitful, multiply and fill the earth (Exodus 1:28).

I will not even hazard a guess on how many others have written exhaustively on both the Ten Commandments and each one individually. However, I have not found much literature exploring the fifth commandment when the family is horribly broken by sin of the parents. More specifically, the sins of abuse, neglect, abandonment, divorce, heretical beliefs and perhaps more are not addressed anywhere near enough for the times in which we live. This is what I hope to shed some light on with this post. I pray those of you who are products of broken families, as I am, may find a blessing. I believe the only way to effectively explore the issue is to lean heavily on Scripture rather than personal conjecture.

Since we are investigating a commandment let’s start with the greatest commandment– the first commandment. Called the Shema (Deuteronomy 6:4-5) Jesus also calls this the greatest commandment (Matthew 22:37-38). “Hear, O Israel! The LORD is our God, the LORD is one!” “You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might.” This becomes relevant to our discussion by looking at the Shema passage context of Deuteronomy 6:1-8 and the immediate linkage between the greatest commandment to the teaching of this commandment to subsequent generations. This is so important to God that He wraps His greatest commandment into the teaching of the Shema to children and grandchildren. He knows once we understand that loving Him is the center of everything that all of His remaining commandments and laws will naturally flow through all of His people. By extension this includes fifth commandment of honoring and obeying parents.

God is perfect and His plan for families is perfect as well. When father, mother and children are all lovingly submitted to God they will each experience the most of His blessings and providence. Here we see that the blessing promised in the fifth commandment is not just directed at children but also at parents. All are blessed when this commandment is followed. There will be harmony in the family and thus the most glory will be given back to God. From a most practical standpoint of God’s providence children who are incapable of caring for themselves will be cared for by parents. The very same promise is extended to parents who are aged and/or infirmed and can no longer take care of themselves.

While God is perfect, people are most certainly not perfect. Romans 3:23, “for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” Sadly, sin has consequences; always does, always will. God in his loving grace has made perfect provision for our sins through Jesus Christ. He frees us from the judgment of sin through Jesus’ atoning death but it’s been my experience that God very rarely frees us from the consequences of our sin. When it comes to families the destructive consequences of sin can be multigenerationally devastating. Our churches are full of believing Christians who continue to be trapped in the cycle of generational sin. This sin of divorce is probably the best known of these. There are families of which I know who are made up of children of divorced parents who they themselves have been divorced and the children of these children are also divorced. The sinful example of one generation just keeps going on and on.

When we begin to consider the dysfunctional family we come to a fork in the road. The most familiar subject matter usually deals with disobedient children. There are many Scripture verses dealing with this (see Exodus 21:15, 17, Leviticus 20:9, 26:14-16, Deuteronomy 21:18-21 Proverbs 13:24, 23:13-14, 30:17, Matthew 15:4, Mark 7:9-10, Ephesians 5:6, 6:1-3). The Bible clearly makes a compelling and irrefutable requirement upon children to honor and obey their parents. Under Mosaic law, disobedient children could be stoned to death as we read in Deuteronomy 21. However, the question that is rarely, if ever, asked is the requirement of children to honor and obey disobedient and sinful parents. What does the Bible have to say about this area of family dysfunctionality?

The verse that gives direct instructions from God to the children of disobedient parents is Ezekiel 20:18-19. “I said to their children in the wilderness, ‘Do not walk in the statutes of your fathers or keep their ordinances or defile yourselves with their idols. ‘I am the LORD your God; walk in My statutes and keep My ordinances and observe them.” Clearly, God has removed the requirement to obey parents in any ungodly behavior they may exemplify or teach. This makes absolute sense when we consider two things about God. First, God owns everything and everyone in and on the earth. Psalm 24:1 “The earth is the LORD’S, and all it contains, The world, and those who dwell in it.” Ezekiel 18:4 “Behold, all souls are Mine; the soul of the father as well as the soul of the son is Mine…” Children belong to God not parents. Parents are stewards of God’s gift of children and as stewards God holds them responsible for the children’s well-being. Second, the primary responsibility of parents is to teach by example their children and prepare them for a loving relationship with God. If mothers and/or fathers abdicate this primary responsibility the children appeared to be no longer required to honor or obey them. Look at one of this topics keynote versus in the New Testament: Ephesians 6:1-4: Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right… Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord. Consider these quotations of Jesus: “but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a heavy millstone hung around his neck, and to be drowned in the depth of the sea (Matthew 18:6).” Also, “Let the children alone, and do not hinder them from coming to Me; for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these (Matthew 19:14).” More biblical examples of God’s preeminence over parents are Luke 9:59-60 and Matthew 12:46-50 These Scriptures all clearly show that God has little patience with anyone (which includes parents) who get in the way of children coming into a loving relationship with Him. It seems to me that the fifth commandment is therefore conditional not absolute. Further, the reward of long life on the earth is representative of the conditionality of this commandment on both children and parents. While rebellious, disobedient and wayward children can expect no parental blessing; worldly, ungodly and sinful parents have no legitimate claim to homage from their children in God’s purview.

The conditionality of the fifth commandment finds support in the writings of several biblical scholars and commentators. Rooker draws on Calvin and Blidstein when he writes, “’Are children to show obedient honor in absolutely everything?’ The issue may regard the pathetic situation in which a parent orders a child to do something illegal or unacceptable. Here a line must be drawn, as God would not desire that in obeying a parent, a child would engage in activity contrary to the teaching of Scripture. The child is to honor his parent “in the Lord” (Eph 6:1). If a father or mother should lead a child into unrighteousness, obedience to that parent is to be withheld (Rooker, 3034-3037).” Owlsley relates parenthood to the Old Testament understanding of office, “It is important to understand that honor was conditional. People had to measure up to the level of the honored office, not only by achievement and competence but also through good character, knowledge, wisdom, and integrity (Prov. 15:33; 22:4; 29:23). Personal integrity consistent with God’s moral standards was a means to maintain an esteemed life. This included parents (Owlsley, 2020).” The author of the gotquestions.org article about honoring parents cites Ezekiel, “While we are required to honor parents, that doesn’t include imitating ungodly ones (Ezekiel 20:18-19). If a parent ever instructs a child to do something that clearly contradicts God’s commands, that child must obey God rather than his/her parents (“What Does It Mean…”, gotquestions.org).”

Let’s move now to the writings of Paul. All of Paul’s writings were of course inspired by the Holy Spirit. It is generally thought that Paul’s pastoral epistles (Philippians, Colossians, Philemon) were sent during Paul’s first imprisonment in Rome circa 60-63 AD with most biblical scholars settling on 62 A.D. The epistle to the Ephesians was also written around the same time. According to Philippians 1:1 Timothy was with Paul in Rome when all of these epistles were crafted. This chronological timeframe is relevant to our discussion concerning the fifth commandment. Paul issues instructions to families in Colossians 3:18-21 and Ephesians 6:1-4 (Biblehub, The Epistles of Paul, link below). Specifically, Colossians 3:20 is in view, “children, be obedient to your parents in all things, for this is well pleasing to the Lord.” Which is a remarkable parallel to Ephesians 6:1, “children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right.” With this background developed let’s consider Timothy and his relationship with Paul.

Timothy’s background is revealed in Acts 16:1-3 with additional details revealed in 1 and 2 Timothy. He was the son of a mixed marriage of a Jewish mother and a Greek father but he was raised in the Jewish faith by his mother Eunice and his Jewish grandmother Lois. Both Eunice and Lois were believers in Jesus Christ. Paul wanted Timothy to accompany him but as an uncircumcised Jew Timothy was not allowed to enter synagogues where Paul would do most of his early preaching. We know very little about Timothy’s father and speculating in the void of scriptural evidence is of little benefit. For whatever reason Timothy was raised a Jew but was not circumcised. Acts 16:3 Paul arranges for the circumcision of Timothy. We can only question with regard to what if any confrontations occurred with Timothy’s father, a Greek. There is no biblical evidence that Timothy’s father was a believer. There is also no biblical evidence as to the status of their relationship. The Bible does give us substantial evidence however of Paul’s cherished regard of Timothy. Paul refers to Timothy as his “beloved son,” and “true child in faith.” In 2 Timothy Paul commends Timothy’s mother and grandmother but makes no mention of Timothy’s father. For a detailed presentation of Timothy’s life read, The Pauline Circle by FF Bruce, 2006.

We are now ready to draw these two trajectories of reasoning together by considering the chronological ordering of the writing of the epistles of Paul. Sources agree that Colossians was written prior to Ephesians although both were written during the time of Paul’s first imprisonment in Rome (Biblehub). Remember, Timothy is with Paul in Rome at the time. Remember also Timothy is mentioned by name in the pastoral epistles. Now, look at the parallel verses with regard to obedience to parents in Colossians 3 and Ephesians 6. They are virtually the same except in Ephesians the phrase “in the Lord” is added. This could account for the honoring of Timothy’s mother and grandmother, the circumcision of Timothy, Paul’s loving and fatherly relationship with Timothy and the noticeable absence of Timothy’s Greek father in the biblical record. Finally, Timothy served as Paul’s representative in the Ephesus church for a period of time according to 1 Timothy 1:3. Consistently throughout all of Paul’s epistles an overriding concern of Paul is our witness of Jesus Christ. In how many different epistles has Paul set forward a believer’s responsibility to live according to the word of God. Timothy’s testimony would most certainly be on solid biblical ground as he dealt with the doctrinal problems in the Ephesus church with the addition of “in the Lord” to the Ephesians epistle. It would eliminate any questioning of Timothy’s motivations or credibility. There is no way that Paul under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit would have written something contrary to the fifth commandment. The fifth commandment must therefore be conditional under the umbrella of bringing glory to the Lord.

Proving the conditionality of the fifth commandment was necessary. It is my belief that too many times believing adult children of abusive, neglectful, ungodly, or worldly parents have been browbeaten by well-meaning brothers and sisters in Christ that we must pursue relationship and reconciliation with these disastrous parents because we are under some kind of compulsion from God. Further, I believe forcing the emotional trauma of unconditional reconciliation upon these Christians who have been devastated by these kinds of parents does not only deepen the divide between the generations but it also introduces conflict into these people’s own relationship with God because they are made to feel that they must pursue reconciliation because they are commanded by God and not doing so would be considered sinful disobedience. The better and more biblically legitimate place is individual responsibility for our own sin to God. Once that is understood, we can move forward through healthy relationship building found in the forgiveness of our sins, forgiveness of others of their sins towards us, and pursue biblical reconciliation under the Lordship of Jesus Christ. I will go into this more in my next post.

Rooker, Mark. The Ten Commandments: Ethics for the Twenty-First Century (New American Commentary Studies in Bible and Theology). (Kindle Locations 3034-3037) B&H Publishing Group. Kindle Edition. Blidstein, Gerald, Honor Thy Father and Mother: Filial Responsibility in Jewish Law and Ethics (New York: KTAV, 1975), 38. Calvin, John Commentaries on the Last Books of Moses, trans. C. Bingham (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1979), 3:8.

Owlsley, Donald; "What Does The Bible Mean To Honor Your Parents?"; 2020 (Date accessed: October 15, 2021); https://www.relavate.org/discipline/2020/9/17/what-does-the-bible-mean-to-honor-your-parents

"What Does It Mean To Honor My Father And Mother?" (Date accessed: October 15, 2021) https://www.gotquestions.org/honor-father-mother.html

Biblehub: The Epistles of Paul The Chronological order(Date accessed October 16, 2021): https://biblehub.com/library/schaff/history_of_the_christian_church_volume_i/section_88_the_epistles_of.htm. There is also: http://www.biblecharts.org/newtestaament/achronologyofpaulswritings.pdf







Many people on various social media are claiming that the Covid –19 injection is the mark of the beast set forth in Revelation 13. However, a reasoning based on a little research will prove it cannot be unless scripture is very significantly molded to fit or reduced to nonsensical allegory. That alone should give us pause to stop this nonsense because there is no legitimacy to either bending the truth of events or the truths of Scripture to meet each other. Let’s consider just a few reasons why the Covid-19 injection cannot be the biblical “Mark of the Beast.”

The single biggest reason is the lack of biblical context for such a claim. According to Revelation 13, a few things must happen that immediately precede humankind’s reception of the mark. The mark of the beast is imposed upon humankind by the false prophet. The false prophet is capable of performing great signs such as calling down fire from heaven. The false prophet does this so that mankind will worship the Antichrist.

Additionally, the mark of the beast is about being identified with the Antichrist and worshiping the Antichrist primarily and only secondarily are the issues of buying and selling without the mark being forbidden (Revelation 13:16-17).

If anyone will please point out to me who the false prophet is and when these great signs and wonders were performed it would be very helpful. Truth is neither of these have happened yet. We know from Scripture the Antichrist will receive a fatal head wound but yet will be resurrected. People will believe this person, yes an actual person, is God incarnate and will worship him. We have neither seen the Antichrist nor witnessed anyone being resurrected from the dead.

There is significant conjecture about the identity of the Antichrist. With the leading contender, according to a preterist interpretation, being the Roman Emperor Nero. Adherents to this belief system can be quite enthusiastic about defending this assertion. There are many reasons why Nero was not the Antichrist. The most significant reason why it could not have been Nero is such an assertion requires the book of Revelation being written in A.D. 68 which is contrary to the vast majority of biblical scholarship which actually puts the writing of Revelation circa 90 A.D. Biblical scholar Peter Goemann has exhaustively refuted the argument of preterists in this article:
https://www.petergoeman.com/the-mark-of-the-beast-666-and-nero-rev-1318/

Goemann cites the writings of the second century Christian scholar Irenaeus. This is important because Irenaeus was a disciple of Polycarp – a disciple of apostle John. In his writings Against Heresies, Irenaeus posits several possibilities but Nero is not one he considers. For an excellent discussion of Irenaeus on 666 see:
https://www.jdavidstark.com/irenaeus-on-666-and-616/

Another significant reason why Nero could not have been the Antichrist is according to the Bible, the Army of the Antichrist is defeated in the battle of Armageddon. During which the beast (Antichrist), and the false prophet are “seized and thrown alive into the lake of fire… ” (Revelation 19:19-20). The Roman Emperor Nero met a significantly different demise when he stuck his own sword in his throat while hiding from his praetorian guard.

If we depart from the Antichrist being a specific person and go with another viewpoint which argues that the Antichrist is a overall system of one world economy/government, the Covid –19 jabs still cannot be the mark of the beast and come anywhere near a biblical reference. Receiving the mark of the beast is primarily a religious/worship issue as we have seen previously as it is instituted by the false prophet. I know of no one world religious system at this time. The mark of the beast therefore is not primarily an economic event.

It should be pretty obvious by now that my argument against this injection = mark fallacy is based on a more normal reading of The Revelation of Jesus Christ. I have studied all three primary eschatological lines of biblical reasoning and belief that the premillennial dispensationalist view garners the most significant biblical support. Admittedly, it too is not without its faults. Here is a link that gives a good basic overview of dispensational premillennialism.
https://www.gotquestions.org/dispensational-premillennialism.html

Of course, we cannot be dogmatic about any of this. But when we look at scripture a couple of key things we must always keep in mind. “A text without a context is a pretext.” You cannot just randomly pluck a line of Scripture out of its passage and say this is what it means. Generally, the best approach to interpreting Scripture is to adopt the simple reading of the actual words within the historical – cultural background of the original author and intended recipients of the writing. God inspired these words to be used for a reason. Words matter, context matters, historical equivalence matters significantly because readers of Scripture in the first and second century would have to come away with the same meaning as modern-day allegorical interpretation proposes. In other words, how likely is it that first and second century Christians reading these texts would understand Covid – 19 injections? Yeah, good luck explaining that one. Maybe if you could speak koine Greek…

14But even if you should suffer for the sake of righteousness, you are blessed. And do not fear their intimidation, and do not be troubled,
15but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence;

– New American Standard Bible: 1995 update. La Habra, CA: The Lockman Foundation.

There are many ways to approach the interpretation of Scripture. While I am not declaring that my adopted method is the best or only way, I believe that this method, with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, gets me to what God is telling me and wanting me to understand. When it comes to reading and interpreting Scripture our starting point must be an understanding of what exactly is Scripture. My working definition of Scripture is “the revealed word of God as related to the authors of the various texts through the indwelling Holy Spirit. These authors used the words, idioms, cultural references that would have been understood by the intended readership.” So when I look at a passage of Scripture I understand that these authors would have used Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. They would not have used Latin, English, etc. now I will be the first one to confess that I do not read or speak Greek, Aramaic, or Hebrew. The good news is that there are many godly men who do and a few of them have faithfully set out to provide translations from these languages into modern English. In case you were wondering this is why I often will look up the passage keywords in these ancient languages to verify the translations of the various Bibles that I use. Based on my experience no Bible version or translation is without error. The Bible is not the inspired word of God – Scripture is. Consider 2 Timothy 3:16 – “all Scripture is God breathed…” This verse does not say the Bible is God breathed. Now that we have chased that rabbit and grabbed it by the ears, let’s move on.

Keywords:
To me the keywords of these two verses are: suffer, righteousness, blessed, sanctify, defense, account, gentleness, and reverence. This by no means precludes all the other words and if you feel obliged to look them up – go for it. I will provide a list of the reference materials that I use at the end of this post.

sufferπάσχω páschō; fut. peísomai, 2d aor. épathon; perf. pépontha. To suffer, to be affected by something from without.
Righteousnessδικαιοσύνη dikaiosúnē; gen. dikaiosúnēs, fem. noun from díkaios In the epistles of Peter, righteousness is the holy life in contrast to sin as in 1 Pet. 2:24, “that we, having died unto sins, should live unto righteousness”
Blessed μακάριος makários; fem. makaría, neut. makárion, adj. A prose form of the poetic mákar (n.f.), blessed one. Blessed, possessing the favor of God, that state of being marked by fullness from God. It indicates the state of the believer in Christ
Sanctify ἁγιάζω hagiázō; fut. hagiásō, from hágios (40), holy. To make holy, sanctify. To regard and codes venerate as holy, to hallow (Matt. 6:9; Luke 11:2; 1 Pet. 3:15; Sept.: Is. 8:13; 10:17; 29:23). Thus the verb hagiázō, to sanctify.
Defense ἀπολογία apología; f: to speak on behalf of oneself or of others against accusations presumed to be false—‘to defend oneself.’
Account λόγος lógos; gen. lógou, masc. noun from légō (3004), to speak intelligently. Intelligence, word as the expression of that intelligence, discourse, saying, thing.
(II) Reason, the reasoning faculty as that power of the soul which is the basis of speech, rationality.
(B) Reason as demanded or assigned, meaning reckoning, account. (3) Metaphorically with dídōmi (1325), to give, or apodídōmi, meaning to give an account, the relation and reasons of any transaction, explanation (Acts 19:40). With aitéō (154), to ask, beg, meaning to ask for a reason from someone (1 Pet. 3:15).
Gentleness πραΰτης praǘtēs; gen. praǘtētos, fem. noun from praǘs (4239), meek. Meekness, but not in a man’s outward behavior only, nor in his relations to his fellow man or his mere natural disposition. Rather, it is an inwrought grace of the soul, and the expressions of it are primarily toward God (James 1:21; 3:13; 1 Pet. 3:15; Sept.: Ps. 45:4).
Reverence φόβος phóbos; gen. phóbou, masc. noun from phébomai (n.f.), to flee from. Fear, terror, reverence, respect, honor.
(I) Particularly and generally (Matt. 14:26; Luke 1:12; 2:9; 8:37; 21:26; Rom. 8:15; 2 Cor. 7:5, 11; 1 Tim. 5:20; 1 John 4:18; Sept.: Ps. 53:5; Jon. 1:10, 16). Followed by the genitive of person or thing feared meaning that which inspires fear (Matt. 28:4; John 7:13; 19:38; 20:19; Heb. 2:15; 1 Pet. 3:14; Rev. 18:10, 15).

After we replace many of the keywords as they are defined in the original Greek, we can rewrite the verses substituting definitions for the keywords. We end up with these verses reading something like this:

But even if you should be affected or undergo an experience for the sake of the holy life in contrast to sin, you are possessing the favor of God. “And do not fear their intimidation, nor be troubled,”
but regard as holy Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to speak intelligently in defense of yourself to everyone who asks you the rational reasoning for the hope that is in you, yet with an ingrained grace of the soul and fear toward God.

Verse 14 – Now that we know what the Holy Spirit is telling those of the diaspora (c.f. 1 Peter 1:1 dispersion) through the apostle Peter, we can read what the instructions are for those first century believers. In order to do this let’s ask ourselves what might first century Christians be “suffering for the sake of righteousness?” What is the historical-cultural context? We get a hint in the previous verses 8-9. Note that we are instructed to “be harmonious, sympathetic, brotherly, kindhearted, and humble in spirit.” Additionally, “not returning evil for evil or insult for insult but giving a blessing instead.” So by inference, these were probably some of the issues that were in focus. This seems to be reinforced by versus 10-12. We also know from our other Scripture readings that Jesus, the apostles, early Christians (Stephen, James, Barnabas) had confrontations with Jewish leadership. This didn’t just include the temple in Jerusalem but also the synagogues in the dispersion. Perhaps the confrontations were getting pretty ugly and unpleasant for all involved.

Verse 15 – We as followers of Jesus should always be ready to defend why we believe in Jesus to anyone who asks us. We should also note that we are not required to defend the action of any other Christian, church or denomination, Christian organization, or any other thing other ourselves. You see I don’t need to be able to explain why the Baptists do this or the Lutherans do that. I do not need to explain why Billy Graham Ministries or Christian Life Today do what they do. I do not need to explain why the person asking me the question is having about their own trouble with someone else. All Jesus holds me accountable for is myself. Now the hard part about all of this is that we always need to keep in mind that the most important thing is our witness and testimony of the Lord Jesus. When we explain to others why we believe what we believe it can never be in an argumentative tone. It should always be full of grace. The bottom line is you cannot argue someone into heaven.

The final thing we need to look consider with any Scripture after it is interpreted is its application. This passage is pretty straightforward as the insults and other life conditions faced by these first century Christians have not substantially changed over the interceding two millennia. We should be applying the Scriptures to our life in the same way that the first century Christians did. That being said, if someone walked up to you today and asked you about Jesus Christ what would you say? Our loving relationship with our Lord and Savior should be such a part of ourselves that this should be the easiest conversation we will ever have with another person.

Here’s my apology (defense): For I am telling you what was also told to me. That Jesus was crucified for our sins according to the Scriptures. He died and was buried according to the Scriptures. On the third day he was raised from the dead according to the Scriptures. After being raised from the dead Jesus appeared to more than 500 people. Jesus is who he says he is and he lived, died, and was raised from the dead. Eternal life therefore is a free gift of grace from God through Jesus Christ to anyone who believes. The Scriptures tell me that anyone who professes the Lord Jesus and believes he rose from the dead will be saved. I know I have eternal life because of Jesus and no work of mine can secure me that. When I accept Jesus Christ into my heart he fills me with the Holy Spirit which regenerates me into a new creation. I am therefore born again. I am born of the Spirit. This is why I believe what I believe and this is why I know that I have eternal life through Jesus Christ my Lord.

Have you written your apology?

Sources and Reference Materials Used:

– Holmes, Michael W. 2011–2013. The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition. Lexham Press; Society of Biblical Literature.
– Thomas, Robert L., The Lockman Foundation. 1998. New American Standard exhaustive concordance of the Bible: updated edition. Anaheim: Foundation Publications, Inc.
– Louw, Johannes P. & Eugene Albert Nida. 1996. Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament: based on semantic domains. New York: United Bible Societies.
– Vine, W. E., Merrill F. Unger & William White Jr. 1996. Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words. Nashville, TN: T. Nelson.
– Strong, James. 2007. Strong’s Concordance. WORDsearch.
– Zodhiates, Spiros. 2000. The complete word study dictionary: New Testament. Chattanooga, TN: AMG Publishers.
http://godrules.net/library/kjvstrongs/kjvstrongs.htm an excellent interactive and free Strong’s concordance website.

12For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you have need again for someone to teach you the elementary principles of the oracles of God, and you have come to need milk and not solid food.13For everyone who partakes only of milk is not accustomed to the word of righteousness, for he is an infant.14But solid food is for the mature, who because of practice have their senses trained to discern good and evil.

We are going to take the above passage apart in light of the other references in the New Testament to “pure milk of the word.” So let’s take a look at those:

And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual men, but as to men of flesh, as to infants in Christ. I gave you milk to drink, not solid food; for you were not yet able to receive it. Indeed, even now you are not yet able, for you are still fleshly. For since there is jealousy and strife among you, are you not fleshly, and are you not walking like mere men (1 Corinthians 3:1-3, NASB)? Therefore, putting aside all malice and all deceit and hypocrisy and envy and all slander, like newborn babies, long for the pure milk of the word, so that by it you may grow in respect to salvation, if you have tasted the kindness of the Lord. And coming to Him as to a living stone which has been rejected by men, but is choice and precious in the sight of God, you also, as living stones, are being built up as a spiritual house for a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ. (1 Peter 2:1-5, NASB).

The key concepts of both of these passages are milk and growth. In both of these passages the word milk is used as a metaphor for passages of Scripture that are easier to understand. The implied metaphor is that newly born Christians (i.e. recently saved) are not ready for anything but the most simple “predigested food” provided by more experienced and practiced Christians. How many parents of a newborn baby slap a T-bone steak on a plate in front of their new child put a fork and knife in each of their baby’s hands and then smile as the child eats. How ridiculous! Right? No of course we would not do that. Continuing the same line of thought does anyone know of an adult still being nursed by his or her mother? Of course not. The adult has been eating solid food for years. With the biblical context now provided, let’s do a deep dive into Hebrews 5:12-14.

First things first. What are some of the historical-cultural backdrops for the book of Hebrews? Briefly: the main internal evidence (v. 13:24) suggests the recipients of this epistle were born again Jewish Christians residing in Rome. Secondarily, this is supported by the overall epistle’s extensive subject matter being a discussion of the Jewish Temple worship system. A first century Gentile living in Rome would have no way of understanding these concepts. There is quite a bit of external scholarship which also supports a Jewish Christian readership as well as the dating of the epistle pre-70 A.D. This dating is important in respect of the Christian persecutions in Rome 64 to 68 A.D. which may have been the impetus for many Jewish Christians denying their Christian conversion in order to escape the horrors of Nero. I believe that this is quite likely the reason that this epistle was written. These will be listed in the footnotes.

Having developed all that, which would be useful in a more robust reading and studying of the book of Hebrews; the narrow scope of our immediate study is not really dependent upon this understanding as both Christians of a Jewish background and Christians of a Gentile background share the exact same call to grow spiritually. Remember, we are all called to “work out your own salvation (Philippians 2:12).”

As always, passages of Scripture must be looked at in the immediate context of the surrounding verses. While we are considering versus 5:12-14, the immediate subject matter is a discussion of the priestly qualifications of the Lord Jesus including His being “designated by God as high priest according to the order of Melchizedek (v. 10).” The epistle writer indicates a lot more to discuss about Melchizedek but unfortunately the readers are “dull of hearing (v. 11).” The actual Greek word employed is νωθρός <nōthrós> meaning slothful or sluggish. Now I don’t know about you, but that does not sound to me to be all that uplifting of a tone. As bad as that is let’s put this in the proper perspective. We all agree that Scripture is “God breathed” right? If we truly believe that, then exactly who is calling the recipients of this epistle a bunch of dullards? Ouch! In light of that we move on to verse 12.

Verse 12 – “For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you have need again for someone to teach you the elementary principles of the oracles of God, and you have come to need milk and not solid food.” Pretty clear here that some Christians are not living up to God’s expectations for their spiritual growth. Quite a contrast between God’s expectations that these Christians should be actively teaching others and the reality that they need to go back to remedial education. (On a really quick aside this might be a pretty good reason why baby Christians probably don’t need to be spending much time in the book of Hebrews.) The next part of this first gets into some really solid food. What are the “oracles of God?” The immediate context does not seem to be much help but fortunately this same concept is found in the book of Acts (v.7:38). Going there we draw the connection that the “living oracles” were received by Moses on Mount Sinai. Living oracles then must mean the living Word. So, “elementary principles of the oracles of God” means the basic fundamentals of the living Word of God. And we know from John 1:1ff the living Word of God is none other than Jesus. The rest of verse 12 states that these Christians now need “the pure milk of the word” because the “deeper mysteries of God” are beyond their grasp.

Verse 13-14 – can be dealt with at the same time following from verse 12. Verse 13 explains that those who receive only the basic instruction do so because they are infants. But the more challenging and harder passages of Scripture are only understood because hearers of this instruction actually practice what they hear so they are able to discern good from evil. These Christians would be considered mature in God’s eyes. This is why all Christians regardless of maturity need to “press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus (Philippians 3:14).”

How many Christians are stuck in the “Sunday morning rut?” They are content merely to be entertained Sunday after Sunday but rarely if ever do they actually try to use what they hear in their daily life. Without this practice – this application of the word of God to our daily life; we are stunted to Christian infancy.

I will amplify this with a story that I heard or maybe read many years ago. It seems that in this given small church a new pastor gave his first sermon and everyone was really impressed with it. Funny thing though it seems that the following Sunday the pastor gave verbatim the very same sermon and people began to wonder what was going on but they didn’t do anything about it. The next Sunday the pastor gave the very same sermon word for word. Well apparently this was too much so one of the long time members of the church asked the pastor after the service why he continued to give exactly the same sermon? The pastor replied that he has not seen any evidence that anyone in the church had begun to apply what he taught in the first week and then again in the second week. Third week same thing and that he would continue to preach the same sermon until the church began to respond and do what he instructed. Something to think about.

– D. A. Carson and Douglas J. Moo, An Introduction to the New Testament, Second ed. (Grand Rapids,
MI: Zondervan, 2005), 608.
– John MacArthur, The MacArthur New Testament Commentary: Hebrews (Chicago, IL: Moody Press,
1983), x.
– F. F. Bruce, The Epistle to the Hebrews (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company 1990), 22.
– George H. Guthrie, Hebrews: The NIV Application Commentary; from Biblical Text… to Contemporary Life (Zondervan, 1998), 21-22
– F. F. Bruce, The Epistle to the Hebrews, 13-14.

All Scriptures sourced: New American Standard Bible: 1995 update. La Habra, CA: The Lockman Foundation.

Yet if anyone suffers as a Christian, let him not be ashamed, but let him glorify God in this matter. For the time has come for judgment to begin at the house of God; and if it begins with us first, what will be the end of those who do not obey the gospel of God? (1 Peter 4:16-17, NKJV)

What is the Holy Spirit through the apostle Peter revealing in this passage of Scripture?

Passage Keywords:

Christians-“Χριστιανός Christianós; gen. Christianoú, masc. noun from Christós (5547), Christ. A name given to the disciples or followers of Christ, first adopted at Antioch. It does not occur in the NT as a name commonly used by Christians themselves (Acts 11:26; 26:28; 1 Pet. 4:16). The believers first became known as Christians as an appellation of ridicule.”

Judgment κρίμα kríma; (2917) gen. krímatos, neut. noun from krínō (2919), to judge. The suffix –ma indicates the result of judging. Judgment, sentence, the reason for judgment.
The act of judging, giving judgment, equivalent to krísis (2920), judgment spoken only in reference to future reward and punishment as in John 9:39, “for judgment I came into the world” (a.t.), meaning in order that the righteous may be approved and the wicked condemned, as is figuratively said in the next clause (see 1 Pet. 4:17).

Scriptural Background context: (adjacent) 1 Peter 4:12-19.
Verse 12: Jesus himself told us that the world would hate us and that we would have tribulation. To expect the Christian life to be one of comfort is self delusional. Many biblical scholars assert that the apostle Peter is specifically referencing the Christian persecutions under Nero (circa A.D. 62-64) reference: Tacitus (Annals 15.44) and W.H.C. Frend, Martyrdom and Persecution in the Early Church (Oxford, 1965).

Verse 13: Today, most people cannot even conceive of the incredible violence that was done to Jesus. The Roman army was not known for its kindness or gentility. They were extremely proficient at inflicting pain, damage, and destruction to the human body. Crucifixion had been developed to practically an art form in brutality and humiliation. if you want a pretty realistic portrayal of the “sufferings of Christ” watched the Mel Gibson film, The Passion of the Christ with one notable exception; crucifixion did not involve loincloths. The whole point of this method of execution was humiliation and shame. Losing your job, home, money, etc. is not a suffering of Christ. The encouragement comes with the second half of the verse explaining that if this severity of suffering and persecution comes upon you just look forward to the exultation and rejoicing when the glory of Jesus Christ is revealed.
Verse 14: if people insult, defame or slander you because of your lifestyle and belief in Jesus Christ consider yourself blessed by God. Put on your full armor of God and stand in the evil day wielding your shield of faith and sword of the Spirit which is the word of God.

Verse 15: if you are suffering because of sin that you have committed there is no glory to God in that. Never forget that God is fully aware of your every sin whether you publicly admit it or not.


Verse 18: is a scriptural proof of verses 16 and 17. This passage comes from Proverbs 11:31.


Verse 19: if God has appointed us to suffer we are to entrust our souls to God because our eternal position has already been secured through our faith in Jesus. Remember that nothing can separate us from the love of God in Jesus Christ (Romans 8:28-31).


So now, let’s take a look at our target verses 16 and 17.


Verse 16: verse 16 is juxtaposed with the conjunction “but” to verse 15. Where the believer is in a suffering condition but perhaps not so severe as the sufferings of Christ. We know from our word study that at the time this passage was written the word Christian is used as a first century pejorative. Being a “Christian” in the first century was not seen as a good thing by either the world or the early church. But since the believer is suffering because of his or her identification by the world as being “Christian” the believer should see no shame in it but rather glorify God in this identification. This seems consistent with the understanding from the historians of the day that it was widely believed that Nero himself started the fire which burned down much of the city of Rome and killed many people. Yet, here he blames and causes suffering upon innocent people who had nothing to do with the crime but were only suffering because of their identification as “Christian.”


Verse 17: here Peter is giving the application from his use of parallel verses from Proverbs 11:31 (remember, demarcations of Scripture did not exist in the first century). The Holy Spirit through Peter is telling the early church being persecuted or experiencing suffering to put things into perspective of “if God is allowing this to happen to me who loves Him and obeys Him, how much worse is the suffering going to be upon those who do not obey God or the gospel of salvation through Jesus Christ.”

This was a difficult passage to come to grips with because my personal belief system is to not only resist such tyranny but fight back against repression and oppression with every ounce of energy I can muster. Problem is that my personal belief system can no longer be the basis of my actions while at the same time submitting my will to the will of God.
God’s will as revealed through the Holy Spirit is for me to be in a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and thusly submit myself to the Lordship of Jesus. With that submission my life becomes a life lived with the singular purpose of worshiping and obeying Jesus.


It is further interesting to note that most historians agree that the Christian persecutions under Nero were localized only to the city of Rome but Peter addressed this epistle to churches in Asia Minor. Perhaps Peter is telling these distant Christians who have no real fear of being burned or torn apart by animals, “look at how strong the faith of these Roman Christians is that they will not deny Jesus Christ even at the cost of their own life.”


Finally consider the hymn by Martin Luther written more 500 years ago, “Let goods and kindred go. This mortal life also. The body they may kill God’s truth abideth still. His Kingdom is forever!” I can assure you from what I have studied that those who protested against the Roman Catholic Papists in the 15th century experienced no comfortable life.

Application: like it or not I cannot see where any of our current sufferings brought about by our illegitimate despotic United States government are targeted at us because of our faith in Jesus Christ. Further, even if they were, we believers will not be able to find any biblical support for responses beyond legal activism or peaceful and legal civil disobedience We also must acknowledge that if there are consequences to our civil disobedience these must be accepted. That being stated I am not seeing any signs that any of this mess we are in will be ending anytime soon and I will not comply with any illegal directives, mandates, orders, suggestions, demands, etc. I will use every legal and peaceful means at my disposal to resist this tyranny. Things have definitely escalated over the last nine months. One thing I do take away from this is it that it is much better to decide what I am going to do now so that I do not have to decide under the pressure of the moment should some persecution based on my faith in Jesus Christ come about. Other than that my prayer will continue to be “please come quickly Lord!”

Hello. My name is Keith Burt. I am no one special; just a follower of Jesus Christ. I am not a pastor. In fact, I suspect that I am probably a lot like you. In this life I have had a few victories, a few defeats, and lots of “I don’t know.”

My journey through the Bible began in 1997 with a vow to read one chapter a day, study its application to my life, and pray. With bible, pen and paper at hand, I journaled my daily quiet time with my Father. I cannot overstate the importance of daily bible study and prayer as a tool God uses to mold His children into the likeness of His Son. The living word has power, not just to save us, but to sanctify us!

A few years ago, God placed in my heart a desire to know Him more. I prayed about this for a while – even explored applying to seminary. So, I began a course of self-study in lieu of seminary. Further, God also provided several Godly men who were further along in their theological study to disciple me. These men kept me rooted in sound biblical doctrine while helping me stretch my limits. My desire was and still is to know Him more, and He has opened the floodgates.

In 2011, I answered God’s call to seminary but the years of prior self-study proved invaluable   I realize now that this was one of the ways God uses each of us to spread His word. It’s a continuum of passed on knowledge and wisdom that will end on the day we are perfected in Christ. “Not that I have already attained, or am already perfected; but I press on, that I may lay hold of that for which Christ Jesus has also laid hold of me” (Philippians 3:12).. God is so good. Do I know what’s next? Nope, but God does! Maranatha!